There is a very fundamental distinction between proactive and reactive policing, with the former subject to controversy because of the nature of some police tactics that may be employed. Companies that use proactive strategies have a better chance of seizing and retaining the initiative in the competition with other companies application the difference between applying a proactive strategy and a reactive strategy is largely one of preparation and accountability.
The difference between proactive and reactive strategies are as followed: proactive strategies are strategies put in place to try and prevent behaviours and incidents, where reactive strategies are strategies that deal with the behaviour or incident as it is happening and afterwards.
Anticipate: the difference between proactive and reactive organizations by: camelia ram:: published: they used a focused set of scenarios to explain how the situation would evolve having convinced leaders of the imminent danger, they were ready when oil prices shot up again in 1979 due to the iran-iraq war decision strategies. A proactive approach focuses on eliminating problems before they have a chance to appear and a reactive approach is based on responding to events after they have happened the difference between these two approaches is the perspective each one provides in assessing actions and events. Proactive & reactive strategies gary champlin, phd strategies for dealing with challenging behaviors (ie, problem behaviors) can be classified as either proactive or reactive proactive strategies are interventions which are used on an ongoing basis in an attempt to reduce. With codes (proactive) they sponsor educational advertisements on television (proactive) when there is a fire, they put out the fires and try to save lives and property (reactive) positive approaches to behavior management (and fire management) emphasize the use of proactive as opposed to reactive strategies.
There is a very fundamental distinction between proactive and reactive policing, with the former subject to controversy because of the nature of some police tactics that may be employed proactive. Reactive and proactive are two terms between which a number of differences can be identified if you look closely, both words reactive and proactive have the root word ‘active’ common in them it is their prefixes that make all the difference.
For proactive companies, the answer is because the future happens today reactive organizations are all too prevalent in today’s economy crisis management efforts focused on protecting existing markets and perceiving the environment as the norm define such organizations. Both proactive and reactive business strategies are essential for a business to succeed over the long term strategies are proactive when they are based on anticipating future needs or concerns, with actions taken to accommodate those needs before they arise. Proactive as opposed to reactive strategies if we do a good job with the proactive strategies, the reactive strategies will not be necessary (or at least will be necessary less often.
Reactive policing, also known as traditional policing, is the standard style of law enforcement in which authorities respond to calls of service and react to criminal incidents proactive policing is the newer concept of policing that enlists the practice of preventing crimes before they happen.